In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
About The Award
The 10th International Millennium Impact Award 2024, organized by SPHERT in association with Research Gateway, recognizes and celebrates outstanding contributions in various fields of research and innovation. This prestigious award honors individuals and organizations that have made significant impacts through groundbreaking research, innovative solutions, and dedicated efforts to drive positive change in society. The event serves as a global platform to acknowledge excellence, foster collaboration, and inspire future advancements that contribute to a sustainable and prosperous world.
Nominations for this esteemed award have commenced globally, offering a unique opportunity for researchers and innovators to gain international recognition. Winning this award can significantly enhance one's career, opening doors to new opportunities, collaborations, and further advancements in their respective fields. These awards are given in diverse fields including Education, Research, Management, Finance, Media and Journalism, and many more, highlighting the wide-ranging impact of innovative contributions across various sectors.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
International Chief Guest will be Heading the Ceremony.
How to Enter in the Competition? To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings - Financial Inclusion
- Entrepreneur Skills
- Computer skills
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings - Financial Inclusion
- Entrepreneur Skills
- Computer skills
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings - Financial Inclusion
- Entrepreneur Skills
- Computer skills
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
SPHERT COVID Heroes Awards 2021 salute the invincible spirit of corona warriors who have led the battle against the Covid-19 pandemic has begun. The Awards are dedicated to people who have done deeds that have inspired people across the society and their work has created a deep impact on the life’s of people.
We would like to invite you to fill-up your Nomination or Nominate someone, who you think will be a person whose contribution should be celebrated.
Eligibility: These Awards are open for Nomination from all sectors Corporate, Public, Private, Large, Medium, Small-scale Industrial/Service Sector Companies/ organizations/ Units and their Team.
Award categories: The awards will be given across below mentioned categories: - Best Contribution in Spreading Awareness;
- Best Far-Reaching Corporate Contribution;
- Best Wider Social Impact;
- Best Vaccination Awareness Award;
- Best Testing Facility;
- Best Timely Help;
- Best Innovation for Covid-Related Activity in Times of the Pandemic;
- Best Logistics Services Provider;
- Best Entity/person Offering Healthcare Services;
- Best Health Manager.
RESEARCH AWARDS ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings - Financial Inclusion
- Entrepreneur Skills
- Computer skills
- People Participation and Series of Development Process
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS 2019 ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS - 2018 ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS 2017 ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Innovation and Knowledge Excellence can lead to considerable improvements in organisational efficiency and effectiveness, not to mention competitive advantage.
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS 2016 ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
In Recognition of Positive Impact With difference
How to Enter in the Competition?
To enter the competition this year we are asking, in the first instance, for a 300 word abstract describing the initiative. If your proposal is suitable you will be invited to submit a full case history of no more than 3000 words, which will be considered as an entry to the competition. A panel of international adjudicators will evaluate the case histories. When preparing your abstract, keep in mind that full case histories will be structured around the following headings
1. Introduction to the nature and its specific objectives 2. The infrastructure i.e. people, systems, hardware, software etc. required to launch the initiative 3. The challenges that were encountered, how they developed and how they were overcome 4. How the initiative was received by the users or participants 5. The learning outcomes that were achieved and how they were measured and evaluated 6. Plans to further develop the initiative.
RESEARCH AWARDS 2015 ORGANISEZED BY SPHERT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL’S, PROFESSORS, ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, LECTURERS, GUEST LECTURERS Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLARS
Category - Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Best Doctor of the year
- Best Principal of the year
- Best Professor of the Year
- Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Researcher of the Year
- Best Scientist of the year
- Best Teacher Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Distinguished Researcher Award of the Year
- Distinguished Scientist of the year
- Emerging Researchers
- Excellence in Research
- Excellent Scientist of the year
- Innovative Researcher of the Year
- Innovative Scientist of the year
- Knowledge Mobilization Award
- Outstanding Faculty Research
- Young Researcher Award
Specific Awards - Best Publication Award
- Best Research Supervisor Award
- Best Director/Principal Award
- Academic Entrepreneurship Award
- Best Women Faculty Award
- Young Researcher Award
- Best Teacher Award
- Many more
INNOVATION AND EXCELLENT WORK IN THE FIELD OF - Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Arts
- Arts and Humanities
- Biochemistry
- Business
- Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry
- Commerce
- Computer Science
- Culture
- Decision Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Econometrics and Finance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- ENGINEERING
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Humanities
- Immunology and Microbiology
- Indian Language
- Management and Accounting
- Management
- Materials Science
- Mathematics
- Medical Sciences
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Neuroscience
- Nursing and Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Physics and Astronomy
- Psychology
- Science
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Technology
- Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
- Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
|